Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 23 Jul 1998 10:41:57 +0930
From:      Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>
To:        junkmale@xtra.co.nz, questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: subnets: which address block and why?
Message-ID:  <19980723104157.E8993@freebie.lemis.com>
In-Reply-To: <19980722163952.A12673@ucb.crimea.ua>; from Ruslan Ermilov on Wed, Jul 22, 1998 at 04:39:53PM %2B0300
References:  <3.0.5.32.19980721001331.007c0ea0@clean.net> <Pine.BSF.4.00.9807211406180.8360-100000@resnet.uoregon.edu> <199807220833.UAA25909@cyclops.xtra.co.nz> <19980722163952.A12673@ucb.crimea.ua>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday, 22 July 1998 at 16:39:53 +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 1998 at 08:33:50PM +1200, Dan Langille wrote:
>> According to RFC-1918, the private / reserved networks are:
>>
>>     10.x.x.x
>>     172.16-31.x.x
>>     192.168.x.x
>>
>> Is there any advantage or one over the others?  Or is it merely a matter
>> of preference?
>
> Well, these are Class A, B and C networks respectively.

There's no particular preference.

Greg
--
See complete headers for address and phone numbers
finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980723104157.E8993>