Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 11:19:42 +0300 From: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> To: Wen Heping <wen@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/graphics/eog-plugins Makefile ports/graphics/shotwell Makefile ports/graphics/ethumb Makefile ports/multimedia/dvdstyler Makefile ports/multimedia/mlt Makefile ports/net/mediatomb Makefile ports/net/minidlna Makefile ports/sysutils/tracker-client ... Message-ID: <91037985@h30.sp.ipt.ru> In-Reply-To: <201103040215.p242FAt2050677@repoman.freebsd.org> (Wen Heping's message of "Fri, 4 Mar 2011 02:15:10 %2B0000 (UTC)") References: <201103040215.p242FAt2050677@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 4 Mar 2011 02:15:10 +0000 (UTC) Wen Heping wrote: > wen 2011-03-04 02:15:10 UTC > FreeBSD ports repository > Modified files: > graphics/eog-plugins Makefile > graphics/shotwell Makefile > graphics/ethumb Makefile > multimedia/dvdstyler Makefile > multimedia/mlt Makefile > net/mediatomb Makefile > net/minidlna Makefile > sysutils/tracker-client Makefile > www/swiggle Makefile > x11-fm/gnome-commander2 Makefile > x11-fm/nautilus Makefile > x11-fm/thunar Makefile > x11-toolkits/nucleo Makefile > Log: > - Bump PORTREVISION to chase the update of libexif Was it necessary to bump those and other PORTREVISIONS? So far I was sure that PORTREVISION bumps are necessary as soon as a shlib number changes. -- WBR, bsam
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?91037985>