Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 08 Dec 2017 13:05:51 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 223389] games/oolite: Update to 1.86
Message-ID:  <bug-223389-13-p1L2oXHANR@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-223389-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-223389-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D223389

--- Comment #8 from Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@FreeBSD.org> ---
(In reply to lightside from comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #6)
> > The project seem to be alive, do we really have to accumulate patches
> > belonging to upstream in the tree?
> And how this relates to this PR?

In a way that we should avoid piling up rotten and duplicate patches not ev=
en
belonging to oolite code in the port.

> Do you suggest to propose these patches upstream?

Absolutely.=20

> Feel free to do this, if you want.

It's submitter's work to do the update properly.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-223389-13-p1L2oXHANR>