Date: Thu, 29 Jan 1998 02:13:01 +0900 From: KATO Takenori <kato@migmatite.eps.nagoya-u.ac.jp> To: bde@zeta.org.au Cc: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Subject: Re: bin/5575: mount_msdos won't run setuid-root Message-ID: <19980129021301H.kato@gneiss.eps.nagoya-u.ac.jp> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 29 Jan 1998 02:46:08 %2B1100" <199801281546.CAA11625@godzilla.zeta.org.au> References: <199801281546.CAA11625@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> wrote: > No, vfs.usermount should go away as soon as the access control is fixed. > > Do you think access control is required for union mounts, etc.? I > guess it is until unionfs, etc. are robust. I agree. When access control is fixed and all filesystems are robust, vfs.usermount is meaningless. ---- KATO Takenori <kato@ganko.eps.nagoya-u.ac.jp> Dept. Earth Planet. Sci., Nagoya Univ., Nagoya, 464-01, Japan PGP public key: finger kato@eclogite.eps.nagoya-u.ac.jp ------------------- Powered by FreeBSD(98) -------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980129021301H.kato>