Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 24 Mar 2004 11:52:56 -0800 (PST)
From:      Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
To:        "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org>
Cc:        FreeBSD current users <current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: SF Bay area hackfest
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0403241151520.63489-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
In-Reply-To: <20040324194600.GA8779@dragon.nuxi.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, David O'Brien wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 04:49:51PM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > I don't quite understand why you need commitments for a toolchain
> > upgrade.  From what I understand, TLS support can't happen without
> > it, and by deferring the toolchain update you prevent it from
> > getting done.  But I'll play along regardless...
> 
> SMPng and KSE are both projects that haven't been completed because the
> project only had commitments for the 1st part of the work.  I refused to
> pushed to import new toolchain bits for the to sit dormant not being
> used.  I'd rather use my time working on another part of FreeBSD if the
> net of my time & effort is a NOP.


Ok David, so KSE is now completed to the point that the toolchain is
the bottleneck.. What's your beef?




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0403241151520.63489-100000>