Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 17 Dec 2003 11:48:43 -0800 (PST)
From:      Dorin H <bj93542@yahoo.com>
To:        Doug White <dwhite@gumbysoft.com>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: 5.2-CURRENT: ldd /boot/kernel/kernel  generates signal 6 (ABRT) ?
Message-ID:  <20031217194843.4674.qmail@span.corp.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <20031217092821.V14934@carver.gumbysoft.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> 
> I think it s a peculiarity of how ldd works.  It
> appears to execve() the
> binary in order to get ld.so to look at it, but
> since the kernel binary
> specifies it own loader (for the in-kernel linker)
> it bails.
>
Ok, I agree, but nevetheless, an abort ? :) Could be
something more explicit, but being the only exception
(plus the modules), maybe it is not relevant and the
complications heavier than the user comfort.
 
> The kernel isn't dynamically linked to any libraries
> (how would it load
> them!?!) so this wouldn't return anything anyway.
> 

Hm <scratch, scratch>, so you map dynamic libraries to
user vm spaces, while when they are loaded in kernel
space, we "call" them kld modules ? 

> Without it there is no FreeBSD :)
>

I thought that without the people tinkering here there
would be no FreeBSD :)
Great work!

Thanks,
/Dorin. 
> -- 
> Doug White                    |  FreeBSD: The Power
> to Serve
> dwhite@gumbysoft.com          |  www.FreeBSD.org


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
http://companion.yahoo.com/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031217194843.4674.qmail>