Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 10:51:03 -0400 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: Andy Kosela <andy.kosela@gmail.com> Subject: Re: CLARITY re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with buggy 6.3 Message-ID: <200806231051.03685.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <3cc535c80806080449q3ec6e623v8603e9eccc3ab1f2@mail.gmail.com> References: <3cc535c80806080449q3ec6e623v8603e9eccc3ab1f2@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sunday 08 June 2008 07:49:35 am Andy Kosela wrote: [ much snippage.. ] > there is time to rethink FreeBSD overall strategy and goals. Major > companies using FreeBSD in their infrastructure like Yahoo! or Juniper > Networks would definetly benefit from such moves focused on long term > support of stable releases. I honestly think it is in their interest to > support, even financially FWIW, Yahoo! tracks -stable branches, not point releases. -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200806231051.03685.jhb>