Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2001 12:50:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com> To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@caldera.de> Cc: Mike Smith <msmith@FreeBSD.ORG>, Amit Shah <amitshah@techie.com>, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: threaded device drivers Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0108181249470.59594-100000@beppo> In-Reply-To: <20010818214826.B8481@caldera.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
No, I'm perfectly happy with the current thread mechanism, which should improve over time. On Sat, 18 Aug 2001, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Sat, Aug 18, 2001 at 08:38:09AM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote: > > No, that's not what I wanted to do. I wanted full process context that allows > > me to do tsleeps, etc., although it could probably done via a taskq mechanism > > if I went to the effort to rewrite it as a set of taskqueue calls while in > > 'rebuild' state. > > You might want to take a look at Linux's schedule_task family of cuntions > (kernel/context.c) - it should be straight forward to implement for FreeBSD. > > Christoph > > -- > Christoph Hellwig > Kernel Engineer Unix/Linux Integration > Caldera Deutschland GmbH > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0108181249470.59594-100000>