Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 7 Jan 2017 11:20:37 +0000
From:      Matthew Seaman <matthew@FreeBSD.org>
To:        freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: pkg : Undefined symbol "openat"
Message-ID:  <4dcb4c97-9b17-1e12-bb75-79f2a9624596@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <5976c0fc-e9a4-bf70-a5cf-b063bbe849ce@kapsi.fi>
References:  <15974fd9b76-4ea4-3d956@webprd-m20.mail.aol.com> <5976c0fc-e9a4-bf70-a5cf-b063bbe849ce@kapsi.fi>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--qFxbMXoaITUIGFL4UDkseLpl7ehBT7hii
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="sMKmhqs0Ivwh7kVraogg9pPfH8QLgMooU";
 protected-headers="v1"
From: Matthew Seaman <matthew@FreeBSD.org>
To: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <4dcb4c97-9b17-1e12-bb75-79f2a9624596@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: pkg : Undefined symbol "openat"
References: <15974fd9b76-4ea4-3d956@webprd-m20.mail.aol.com>
 <5976c0fc-e9a4-bf70-a5cf-b063bbe849ce@kapsi.fi>
In-Reply-To: <5976c0fc-e9a4-bf70-a5cf-b063bbe849ce@kapsi.fi>

--sMKmhqs0Ivwh7kVraogg9pPfH8QLgMooU
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 07/01/2017 08:46, Arto Pekkanen wrote:
> Why not just upgrade to the supported release 10.3?

True, this is the best way forwards.  However for people that cannot,
for whatever reasons, do that straight away, they should be able to
maintain their systems reasonably well.  Except that they will have to
do themselves a lot of what is done communally by the project for the
supported versions.

> You are just asking for trouble trying to run software on an obsoleted
> base system version.

In this case, with openat(2) being in libc in 10.3 and successors, but
not in 10.1, there will be an increasing disparity between software
compiled for 10.3 and trying to run on a 10.1 system.  So you'ld have to
build your own packages.

Even so, as the ports no longer supports earlier than 10.3, you'll find
various compile problems edging in.  Those you can workaround by locally
patching your ports tree.  pkg(8) itself is known to compile and work on
OS versions back to 8.x.

In short: it's a lot less effort just to upgrade.

	Cheers,

	Matthew




--sMKmhqs0Ivwh7kVraogg9pPfH8QLgMooU--

--qFxbMXoaITUIGFL4UDkseLpl7ehBT7hii
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=dn/G
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--qFxbMXoaITUIGFL4UDkseLpl7ehBT7hii--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4dcb4c97-9b17-1e12-bb75-79f2a9624596>