Date: Sun, 19 May 2019 22:24:42 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: toolchain@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 237068] /usr/local/bin/ld: BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.30 assertion fail elflink.c:2824 Message-ID: <bug-237068-29464-xw4rUvm0NQ@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-237068-29464@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-237068-29464@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D237068 --- Comment #11 from Mark Millard <marklmi26-fbsd@yahoo.com> --- (In reply to Mark Millard from comment #10) So far going down my own path seems to have confirmed Dimitry Andric's comment #5 still applies, even for powerpc64, but with the additional detail: QUOTE For _bfd_elf_fix_symbol_flags the later gdb output shows that *h has: _ZZN4llvm7hashing6detail18get_execution_seedEvE4seed@@LLVM_6.0 root.type =3D bfd_link_hash_defweak is_weakalias =3D 1 *h->u.alias has: __bss_start@@LLVM_6.0 root.type =3D bfd_link_hash_indirect is_weakalias =3D 0 So that was def (via weakdef) and def->root.type=3D=3Dbfd_link_hash_indirec= t . END QUOTE. So the @@LLVM_6.0 name is involved and so is an alias to: __bss_start@@LLVM_6.0 for bfd_link_hash_indirect. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-237068-29464-xw4rUvm0NQ>