Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 19:09:56 -0500 (CDT) From: Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org> To: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org>, mjacob@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/cam/scsi scsi_sg.c scsi_sg.h src/sys/modules/cam Makefile src/sys/conf NOTES files src/sys/compat/linux linux_ioctl.c linux_ioctl.h Message-ID: <20070407190859.N51247@thebighonker.lerctr.org> In-Reply-To: <46183104.6080904@samsco.org> References: <200704071940.l37Jew2t013708@repoman.freebsd.org> <20070407131228.L71232@ns1.feral.com> <46183104.6080904@samsco.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 7 Apr 2007, Scott Long wrote: > To tell you the truth, the SG device has one of the worst programming > interfaces that I've ever seen. Even the various official docs on it > complain about how bad it is. I've written apps for CAM, including a > swiss-army-knife java-based management app, and CAM is vastly superior. > I tried porting the app to linux and gave up due to how limited and > unpleasant it was. From the kernel side, it's even scarier. > > But beyond that, the work I committed here was about opening up FreeBSD > to more storage management opportunities. So I'm happy with whatever > anyone wants to do with it that furthers that goal. I'd like to see > the native interface be used as a bridge to help introduce programmers > to FreeBSD and CAM; if the sg3_utils package is a step in that > direction or if it provides tools that camcontrol doesn't, then go for > it. > > Scott > I assume that this is NOT a MFC candidate? (Since I think I may have been at least part of the genesis of the request from Roman). [snip] -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 512-248-2683 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round Rock, TX 78681-3893
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070407190859.N51247>