Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 08:08:29 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 111194 for review Message-ID: <20061207080829.1vs0y9xxwsc8kkck@webmail.leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <200612061323.kB6DNgsn098612@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200612061323.kB6DNgsn098612@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting Roman Divacky <rdivacky@FreeBSD.org> (from Wed, 6 Dec 2006 13:23:42 GMT): > http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=111194 > > Change 111194 by rdivacky@rdivacky_witten on 2006/12/06 13:23:04 > > Add an XXX comment about signal delivery in linux_exit_group. > We currently ignore sending a signal if SIGNAL_EXIT_GROUP is set > condition. We dont even implement this flag.... What about a printf in case the flag is set? This way we should notice if it is used somewhere. We could also correlate this with application misbehavior. Bye, Alexander. -- Demand the establishment of the government in its rightful home at Disneyland. http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061207080829.1vs0y9xxwsc8kkck>