Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 11:48:20 -0700 From: Tim Kientzle <kientzle@acm.org> To: John Birrell <jb@cimlogic.com.au> Cc: h@schmalzbauer.de Subject: Re: ports and -current Message-ID: <3F6DF274.3070805@acm.org> In-Reply-To: <20030921021940.GB28195@freebsd1.cimlogic.com.au> References: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10309202038570.19227-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> <20030920.190533.63048335.imp@bsdimp.com> <20030921015927.GA28195@freebsd1.cimlogic.com.au> <20030920.200625.39876120.imp@bsdimp.com> <20030921021940.GB28195@freebsd1.cimlogic.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Birrell wrote: > On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 08:06:25PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: >>At the very least, we should put [-pthread] back as a noop. The timing on >>this really sucks because it breaks the ports tree for an extended >>period of time. While the fixes are simple, they haven't been made >>yet. The fact that the tree is frozen makes it seem like a really bad >>time to make the change. > > > Yes, I think it should go back as a noop (mostly to satisfy the GCC > people though). Perhaps put it back as a noop with a particularly loud warning: "Warning: -pthread does nothing. If this is a port, complain to the maintainer to fix it." Tim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3F6DF274.3070805>