Date: Wed, 21 Aug 1996 13:39:29 -0500 From: "Eric L. Hernes" <erich@lodgenet.com> To: current@freebsd.org Subject: does HAVE_FPU really work? Message-ID: <199608211839.NAA23956@jake.lodgenet.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
howdy,
Intrigued by the recent discussion of the math library
and HAVE_FPU, I defined HAVE_FPU in /etc/make.conf
then proceeded to /usr/src/lib/msun, to rebuild
the library:
(ttyp1@jake)# pwd
/usr/src/lib/msun
(ttyp1@jake)# make
cc -O -D_MULTI_LIBM -D_POSIX_MODE -D_IEEE_LIBM -c /usr/src/lib/msun/src/e_acos.
c -o e_acos.o
shouldn't it be compiling /usr/src/lib/msun/i387/e_acos.S ???
Oh, well, make does a lot of stuff under the hood, so I proceeded to let
it compile, but the resultant library libm.so.2.0, has exactly the
same md5 as without HAVE_FPU defined --???
then trying `make -ds e_acos.o', I get amongst other stuff:
SuffFindDeps (e_acos.o)
trying e_acos.s...not there
trying e_acos.S...got it
using existing source /usr/src/lib/msun/src/e_acos.c
applying .c -> .o to "e_acos.o"
looks like it finds e_acos.S, but uses e_acos.c anyway.
does anybody else have this problem, or is it a result of one of my
local hacks?
thanks,
eric.
--
erich@lodgenet.com
http://rrnet.com/~erich erich@rrnet.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199608211839.NAA23956>