Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 06 Feb 1995 12:05:51 -0800
From:      Paul Traina <pst@shockwave.com>
To:        Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@ref.tfs.com>
Cc:        joerg_wunsch@uriah.sax.de, CVS-commiters@freefall.cdrom.com, cvs-lib@freefall.cdrom.com
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/gen getcwd.c 
Message-ID:  <199502062005.MAA10990@precipice.Shockwave.COM>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 06 Feb 1995 11:59:11 PST." <199502061959.LAA06469@ref.tfs.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

  From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@ref.tfs.com>
  Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/gen getcwd.c
  
  go read the source OK ????

The big thing here is that we're changing an operating paradigm.
No one's arguing that it isn't easy to override this, at least
in a shell script,  but people and scripts DON'T expect this
behavior.  I myself have written scripts depending on the fact
that pwd is going to return me the cannonical path to a file
rather than following slimelinks.

I feel this change is a loser... I feel very uncomfortable changing
15 years of historical behavior for a minor performance gain... that's
not the way performance gains are supposed to be eeked out.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199502062005.MAA10990>