Date: Sat, 6 Dec 1997 16:19:55 -0700 From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: Brad Karp <karp@eecs.harvard.edu> Cc: Ken Key <key@cs.utk.edu>, freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 2.2-STABLE boot floppy that supports PCMCIA ed card? Message-ID: <199712062319.QAA06897@mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <199712062157.QAA13115@dominator.eecs.harvard.edu> References: <199712050013.TAA22262@duncan.cs.utk.edu> <199712062157.QAA13115@dominator.eecs.harvard.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> [I managed to get my hands on a 3C589D for the initial install, so my > original unrecognized Linksys problem is now taken care of, and I'm > running 2.2-971204-SNAP on my IBM 380. I'll post my pccard.conf entry > for this card (which has a different CIS tuple than any I've seen > anywhere) shortly.] > > Does pulling 2.2-97MMDD-SNAP get one the latest and greatest PCMCIA > support that I see so much traffic on this list about? Or is it > necessary to explicitly cvsup RELENG_2_2, in addition? If you want to stay -current with -stable (*grin*), then you need to CVSup. If you're happy with the current bits that you have, then stick with them. Note, there are known suspend/resume bugs in the code you have, but they don't occur very often. > If the cvsup is necessary, I'm a bit confused, as I thought that the > SNAPs were by definition the latest RELENG_2_2 build. Yes, but bits change everyday, so the SNAPS are a particular machines latest build. Your machine can build it's own 'unofficial' SNAP if you CVSup the sources. :) Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199712062319.QAA06897>