Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 00:25:13 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sten_Daniel_S=F8rsdal?= <lists@wm-access.no> To: Aristeu Gil Alves Jr <aristeu.jr@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PF-NAT Message-ID: <456F6859.5010205@wm-access.no> In-Reply-To: <2c84c1de0611300832q67d25d13ndadfd2b52ddcf984@mail.gmail.com> References: <62972.217.12.197.82.1164883946.squirrel@sigma.interami.com> <6e6841490611300512t73dca3ddt106d58a3e63bc1f1@mail.gmail.com> <55273.217.12.197.82.1164898183.squirrel@sigma.interami.com> <6e6841490611300803y577338adqf52918ef13ca7605@mail.gmail.com> <2c84c1de0611300832q67d25d13ndadfd2b52ddcf984@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Aristeu Gil Alves Jr wrote: > There's no way to share various PPTP client conections to the same > PPTP server. pf nat only can handle one at the time, since there's no > dst and src port to make more than one nat state. >=20 > Thats what I heard. There is no src/dst port but there is Call ID in the modified GRE header. Each session gets a unique value from which sessions can be identified. Just about any cheap home firewall can do it these days, i wonder why the open source community is reluctant to take advantage. --=20 Sten Daniel S=F8rsdal
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?456F6859.5010205>