Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 1 Jul 2007 20:54:39 +0200
From:      "Claus Guttesen" <kometen@gmail.com>
To:        "Wojciech Puchar" <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
Cc:        Nguyen Tam Chinh <unixvn@gmail.com>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, FreeBSD-Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: UFS2 optimization for many small files
Message-ID:  <b41c75520707011154v495925f6u20f6b0f915d45125@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20070701202709.L64116@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References:  <64b284310706270311j2a6af2f6i6766b483a4b66a5c@mail.gmail.com> <b41c75520707010030u25497199p1ce6b91bd1f5287c@mail.gmail.com> <20070701202709.L64116@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
> > approx. 15 partitions ranging from 400 GB to 2 TB in size.  If the
> > server for some reason had crashed the webservers were unable to
>
> the question is about the reason it crashed...
>
> > access the nfs-mounted partitions during the period the server did a
> > snapshot of a partition, in order to perform a background-fsck and
> > thus our website was down. So ufs2 does not scale well.

Reasons not related to the nfs-server itself. FreeBSD itself was
rock-solid. It was firmware-related on the storage-side.

-- 
regards
Claus

When lenity and cruelty play for a kingdom,
the gentlest gamester is the soonest winner.

Shakespeare



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b41c75520707011154v495925f6u20f6b0f915d45125>