Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:45:36 +0400 From: "Andrew P." <infofarmer@gmail.com> To: Nikolas Britton <nikolas.britton@gmail.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 100Mbit network performance - again Message-ID: <cb5206420507270245262d317d@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <ef10de9a05072701334adbb1f7@mail.gmail.com> References: <cb52064205072616005af207a8@mail.gmail.com> <ef10de9a05072701334adbb1f7@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 7/27/05, Nikolas Britton <nikolas.britton@gmail.com> wrote: > On 7/26/05, Andrew P. <infofarmer@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello all! > > > > I remember being able to reach 11-12Mbytes/s between two Win95 > > workstations with NE2000 $10 NIC's installed, connected via BNC cable. > > I am now able to reach 11-12Mbytes/s between all kinds of Windows > > 2000/XP machines with all kinds of cheapest 100Mbit ethernet hardware. >=20 > How is it possible to get "11-12Mbytes/s" from 10Base2? Redo your math > ( 2(20) * 10 / 8 ) and you get an absolute of 1.31MB/s for 10Mbit > Ethernet. BUT this number has no meaning in the real world! The > theoretical maximum data throughput for a 10Mbps Ethernet system is > 9.744MB/s using 1518 byte frames. The last time I checked Microsoft > could only break anti-trust laws, not physics. >=20 Oh, sorry. You probably can't get 100Mbit over BNC. I meant two combo FastEthernet cards connected via UTP. The question was how can you reach Windows-to-Windows performance between Windows and FreeBSD. Thanks, Andrew P.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?cb5206420507270245262d317d>