Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 20:05:54 +0200 From: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: binutils Message-ID: <20091010200554.30d34cc8.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20091010135525.372d713a@scorpio.seibercom.net> References: <permail-200910101345391e86ffa800007f68-a_best01@message-id.uni-muenster.de> <20091010103623.11ed0154@scorpio.seibercom.net> <44hbu7mhao.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <20091010123423.0b64769f@scorpio.seibercom.net> <D2255331-624F-4088-94C4-2E988E8DF925@mac.com> <20091010135525.372d713a@scorpio.seibercom.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 13:55:25 -0400, Jerry <gesbbb@yahoo.com> wrote: > The only problem with that is that it would get over written when > updating 'world'. I am not sure if a user could exclude binutils from > being installed when building world. Maybe further problems arise when using freebsd-update which relies on several default settings (e. g. GENERIC kernel)... -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20091010200554.30d34cc8.freebsd>