Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 04:16:34 +0300 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" <infofarmer@FreeBSD.org> To: "Mark Linimon" <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>, Dan Langille <dan@langille.org>, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@freebsd.org>, cvs-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11-wm Makefile ports/x11-wm/wmii Makefile ports/x11-wm/wmii-devel Makefile distinfo pkg-plist ports/x11- Message-ID: <cb5206420703081716i31fe87efxdf3d7f80c891f9e4@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20070309005021.GA25328@soaustin.net> References: <200703082025.l28KPtnW061532@repoman.freebsd.org> <45F0343D.26013.156E5B04@dan.langille.org> <45F081D8.5040202@FreeBSD.org> <20070308220513.GB976@zaphod.nitro.dk> <20070308141025.H28436@ync.qbhto.arg> <20070308235307.GA23281@soaustin.net> <cb5206420703081621jb3329aewe9789e55f20ea173@mail.gmail.com> <20070309005021.GA25328@soaustin.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 3/9/07, Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 03:21:55AM +0300, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > > >That's been the policy as long as I know. > > > > We've had a thread in November about this with > > no particular ending. Did I miss anything? > > AFAIAC it's the policy. Right, but we're not alone. I'm not against putting additional info in CVS (I would prefer this to be automated, though), but unless it's set in stone many committers will continue to choose the easiest way - do nothing. > How else, on repocopies, can you tell from the > CVS logs what happened? > > This is a workaround for the obsolete model that > CVS has. We survived enough repocopies without any special forced commits to know that they are not vital. Committer's Guide [1] does not suggest them. [1] http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/committers-guide/article.html#AEN1335
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?cb5206420703081716i31fe87efxdf3d7f80c891f9e4>