Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 10:50:35 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: python@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 238799] net/py-libdnet: Fails to make showconfig or make clean Message-ID: <bug-238799-21822-bvzC7VcdoU@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-238799-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-238799-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D238799 dewayne@heuristicsystems.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |needs-qa Resolution|Not A Bug |Works As Intended --- Comment #5 from dewayne@heuristicsystems.com.au --- (In reply to dewayne from comment #4) This port doesn't build within a jail that doesn't have /dev/bpf0. There i= s a test in configure that checks this event. I think that the better way is to NOT check for any /dev/bpf, where folks build if very low functionality jai= ls.=20 I recall years ago adding bpf to the jail for something like isc-dhcpd-serv= er or similar that must have bpf, probably for the same reason. Regardless I = have one and this takes care of it; it also provides a clue as to where the test= is, if someone would like to remove. :) --- /usr/ports/net/libdnet/Makefile (revision 505080) +++ /usr/ports/net/libdnet/Makefile (working copy) @@ -26,4 +26,7 @@ USE_LDCONFIG=3D yes .endif +post-patch: + @${REINPLACE_CMD} -e 's|/dev/bpf0|/dev/bpf|g' ${WRKSRC}/m4/ac_dnet_bsd_bpf.m4 + .include <bsd.port.mk> --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-238799-21822-bvzC7VcdoU>