Date: Tue, 09 Nov 1999 18:37:32 +0100 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Yoshinobu Inoue <shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp> Cc: jhay@mikom.csir.co.za, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Should jail treat ip-number? Message-ID: <24337.942169052@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 10 Nov 1999 02:28:52 %2B0900." <19991110022852N.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <19991110022852N.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp>, Yoshinobu Inoue writes: >(1)It seems to me that once an IP# is specified for a jail, > then that IP# should not be re-specified for another jail. > Is this true? Generally yes, although nothing in the code tries to (nor should it try to) enforce it. >(2)If (1) is true, then number of jail is restricted to the > number of IP address assigned to that machine. > Then IPv6 support for jail should be very good thing, > because extremely many IP addresses become available for > a machine with IPv6. (which is not with IPv4) I'm not against adding IPv6 functionality to jail(2), my point is merely that until somebody who has sufficient time & ability to fiddle with it does it, it's not going to happen. The usual rule applies: "Great idea, why don't you send me patches which does this ?" -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?24337.942169052>