Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 19 May 2009 21:31:09 +0100
From:      Pete French <petefrench@ticketswitch.com>
To:        dimitry@andric.com, kip.macy@gmail.com
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, marck@rinet.ru
Subject:   Re: RFT: ZFS MFC
Message-ID:  <E1M6Vxt-0008S5-QJ@dilbert.ticketswitch.com>
In-Reply-To: <3c1674c90905191300y32710c9bnaa2001ad345d3b2a@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Many people are happily running an old pool with the new code. I have
> done that in a VM and run load over it just to be certain. The tuning
> still applies to i386. On amd64 vm backpressure works, but may
> actually be too aggressive - shrinking the ARC in favor of the
> inactive pages queue.

I haven't had any i386 code around for a long while, so I will just
try it "as-is". Just need to fin ish moving tghe machine up to todays
-STABLE before applying the patchset (which involved hand fixing bce).

Then, all being well I shall "(the_winds)caution" to coin an old
C joke, and run this up on one of our production DNS servers to
see how it goes.

cheers,

-pete.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E1M6Vxt-0008S5-QJ>