Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 04 Feb 2008 18:04:31 +0100
From:      =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
To:        Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>
Cc:        threads@freebsd.org, Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>, current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Symbol versioning errors in libthr
Message-ID:  <86r6fsd55s.fsf@ds4.des.no>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0802041146260.13899@sea.ntplx.net> (Daniel Eischen's message of "Mon\, 4 Feb 2008 11\:55\:52 -0500 \(EST\)")
References:  <861w7um5o5.fsf@ds4.des.no> <e7db6d980802030759x6db9bf1dq8992542bd8d2e017@mail.gmail.com> <20080203162918.GK57756@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20080203121112.426a8c25@kan.dnsalias.net> <86zlugeqaz.fsf@ds4.des.no> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0802041146260.13899@sea.ntplx.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> writes:
> I question the bumping of FBSDprivate to 1.1.  FBSDprivate is special,
> it is only for use in our base system, and our supported method of
> updating our system is buildworkd/buildkernel - so any changes to
> FBSDprivate should be unnoticed.

A whole lot of assumptions there.  Bumping FBSDprivate costs nothing and
might save our a***s down the road if one of those assumptions turn out
to be false.

(unless you can show that it's actually harmful in some way?)

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86r6fsd55s.fsf>