Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 30 Apr 2007 15:10:11 -0400
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        "[LoN]Kamikaze" <LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: install fails because / is not writeable
Message-ID:  <20070430191011.GA66625@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <4635907D.3020201@gmx.de>
References:  <4635907D.3020201@gmx.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 08:45:17AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
> Once in a while a port fails to upgrade, because it wants to write something in /etc. E.g. perl into /etc/make.conf or other ports into /etc/group.
> 
> On my systems / is normally a read only mount. These ports build fine during a portupgrade and fail during install, leaving most of the port installed, but unregistered (i.e. the package database is broken).
> 
> I think such ports should set something like USE_WRITE_SLASH=yes and refuse to install if / is not writeable.

I don't think this is something we should support in ports - that way
lies madness (what about systems with non-writable /var?  What about
systems with /etc on a md? etc).

Kris



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070430191011.GA66625>