Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 22:05:17 -0800 From: "jl" <tech@scsr.com> To: "Tony Finch" <dot@dotat.at>, "Alfred Perlstein" <bright@wintelcom.net> Cc: <hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: res_ functions thread safe? Message-ID: <000c01c05381$06c42ba0$6503c23f@XGforce.com> References: <20001119225712.W18037@fw.wintelcom.net> <20001121055539.I54653@hand.dotat.at>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
How about do a fork then call res_()? This may help even if ====================================== WWW.XGFORCE.COM The Next Generation Load Balance and Fail Safe Server Clustering Software for the Internet. ====================================== ----- Original Message ----- From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> Cc: <hackers@freebsd.org> Sent: Monday, November 20, 2000 9:55 PM Subject: Re: res_ functions thread safe? > Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> wrote: > >I need to do MX lookups in a threaded program, does anyone know if > >the res_ functions are thread safe, or if there's an alternative > >I can use that is? > > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~ian/adns/ again :-) > > Tony. > -- > f.a.n.finch dot@dotat.at fanf@covalent.net Chad for President! > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?000c01c05381$06c42ba0$6503c23f>