Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 09:19:49 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 247626] net/py-wsdd: Update to 0.6.1 Message-ID: <bug-247626-7788-znBKBkK4g3@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-247626-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-247626-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D247626 --- Comment #4 from Hiroo Ono <hiroo.ono+freebsd@gmail.com> --- Created attachment 216065 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D216065&action= =3Dedit proposed rc.d script. > The vendor version has an unnecesary dependency on Samba (testparm) just = for something like "set the workgroup name", and does not let you set your = own flags in rc.conf for wsdd (often needed for things like "-i em0"). Tha= t's a feature I really, really needed. How about attached rc.d script. With it, you can just add wsdd_suppflags=3D"-i em0" in rc.conf and the rc.d script detect the workgroup automatically. There are alternative choices to write workgroup in rc.conf like wsdd_group=3D"WORKGROUP" to overwrite automatically detected one, or wsdd_domain=3D"EXAMPLE.COM" to replace "-w WORKGROUP" with "-d EXAMPLE.COM". wsdd_flags=3D... does not work, because it will be automatically added to t= he arguments of $command, but if there is a better word than 'suppflags', I wi= ll change the variable name. If this is OK, I think I need to check at least NetBSD and OpenBSD's daemon command and rc script if the above rc.d script might work before reporting = it to upstream. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-247626-7788-znBKBkK4g3>