Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 7 Mar 2019 08:29:04 +0100 (CET)
From:      =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= <Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no>
To:        FreeBSD stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Cc:        mckusick@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: 12-stable buildworld appears to be broken
Message-ID:  <alpine.BSF.2.21.9999.1903070827340.11588@mail.fig.ol.no>
In-Reply-To: <20190307051342.GB34798@rpi3.zyxst.net>
References:  <20190307051342.GB34798@rpi3.zyxst.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 7 Mar 2019 05:13-0000, tech-lists wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> My context is poudriere creating jails on freebsd12-stable. This procedure
> worked fine for some other jails I created a couple days ago (the 5th) but
> now, today I get buildworld failures with creating either amd64 or armv7 jails
> (the server is amd64)
> 
> To try to see the failure, I set jobs to J1 like so:
> 
> poudriere jail -x -J1 -c -j 12armv7 -a arm.armv7 -m svn+https -v
> stable/12
> 
> It bails when it's making rescue with this error:
> 
> /data/poudriere/basefs/jails/12armv7/usr/src/sbin/fsck_ffs/pass1.c:454:13:
> error: too many arguments to function call, expected 0, have 1
>                        inodirty(dp);
>                        ~~~~~~~~ ^~
> /data/poudriere/basefs/jails/12armv7/usr/src/sbin/fsck_ffs/fsck.h:453:1:
> note: 'inodirty' declared here
> void inodirty(void); ^
> 1 error generated.
> *** [pass1.o] Error code 1
> 
> I know that's probably not enough, so have pasted much more output at
> https://rpi3.zyxst.net/errors/poudriere-build-failure.txt
> 
> not tried make buildworld yet on the host. The OS is at r344763 and
> /usr/src is at 344863
> 
> Just tried it on another 12-stable desktop, straightforward make
> buildworld, same sort of error:
> 
> --- all_subdir_sbin/fsdb ---
> /usr/src/sbin/fsdb/fsdb.c:1042:14: error: too many arguments to function
> call, expected 0, have 1
>    inodirty(curinode);
>        ~~~~~~~~ ^~~~~~~~         /usr/src/sbin/fsck_ffs/fsck.h:453:1: note:
> 'inodirty' declared
>        here
>        void            inodirty(void);
> 
> the sources are at 344869

It's good to see I'm not the only one experiencing this issue. It 
looks like r339941 was never merged to stable/12.

-- 
Trond.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.21.9999.1903070827340.11588>