Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 16:55:27 -0400 From: Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com> To: Rafael Ganascim <rganascim@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: em/igb multiqueue support Message-ID: <CACqU3MUGRvgtMVaBrVBGBour04sVyv=2jumC-R8ob72FunZ6MQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAD4ZOMxBQeEafTjpGfSZfRyqQuTJj6t1=GGdwAi5y3nu_1F5=g@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAD4ZOMxBQeEafTjpGfSZfRyqQuTJj6t1=GGdwAi5y3nu_1F5=g@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Rafael Ganascim <rganascim@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I think that this is an old question.... > > I think that Intel 82575 (and another models) hardware are capable of > multiple queues both on the receive and the send side. Is it right? > Currently the processing of packets is limited to one CPU per NIC. > > Can we have multiple taskq processes for one NIC in parallel? Is > anyone working on this right now, and if not does this sound like > something > anyone is interested in doing? (yes, I know the Yandex driver). > igb(4) already supports multiqueue, with 1 task per queue, and you can have at most 4 queue on the 82575. em(4) multiqueue is more controversial. - Arnaud > -- > Best regards, > > Rafael > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CACqU3MUGRvgtMVaBrVBGBour04sVyv=2jumC-R8ob72FunZ6MQ>