Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:50:24 +0200
From:      =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
To:        Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>, FreeBSD Hackers <hackers@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: RFC: Big Makefile patch for WARNS settings
Message-ID:  <86ws30rfun.fsf@ds4.des.no>
In-Reply-To: <4AD30A4B.7060409@FreeBSD.org> (Gabor Kovesdan's message of "Mon,  12 Oct 2009 12:51:55 %2B0200")
References:  <20091011145021.GG36937@acme.spoerlein.net> <20091011170918.GU71731@hoeg.nl> <4AD2FD6E.8090208@FreeBSD.org> <8663aksy43.fsf@ds4.des.no> <4AD30A4B.7060409@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> Yep, I understand that but what I'm saying is that once we are dealing
> with such a big patch, it would be nice to elaborate the highest WARNS
> level of each utility and set them accordingly, which doesn't require
> too much extra effort as opposed to making all of them WARNS=3D6
> compliant.

We can do that in a separate patch / commit.

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86ws30rfun.fsf>