Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 15:46:38 -0700 From: David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Ceri Davies <ceri@FreeBSD.org>, Nik Clayton <nik@freebsd.org>, cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src MAINTAINERS Message-ID: <20020417154638.A42008@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20020417211523.GA1235@submonkey.net>; from ceri@FreeBSD.org on Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 10:15:23PM %2B0100 References: <200204150928.g3F9S6k60661@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020417083410.F30474@canyon.nothing-going-on.org> <20020417134923.A61447@dragon.nuxi.com> <20020417211523.GA1235@submonkey.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 10:15:23PM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote: > > > Warning, bikeshed imminent. . . > > > How about a new Makefile target, so that we can do > > > cd /usr/src/foo/bar > > > make maintainer > > > > This de-centralizes the information; which is the opposite of what > > src/MAINATINERS tries to do. > > No, not really. > The information would still live in src/MAINTAINERS - all the make target > would do would be to look up the current directory in that file. > At least, that's how I understood Nik's suggestion. I know that, but if suggesters were to actually _look_ at src/MAINTAINERS they would understand why I think it is a leap to go from that file to this type of suggestion. So I guess I have to invoke the "where's the patch" so I can understand people's suggestions. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020417154638.A42008>