Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 10:40:53 +0200 From: Phil Regnauld <regnauld@catpipe.net> To: Josef Karthauser <joe@FreeBSD.org>, Chris <chrcoluk@gmail.com>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can I pursuade someone to commit this patch? (Re: Multiple IP addresses in a jail.) Message-ID: <20060801084053.GE22731@catpipe.net> In-Reply-To: <20060801084156.GD3440@genius.tao.org.uk> References: <20060628103238.GA815@genius.tao.org.uk> <20060628103949.GJ2005@catpipe.net> <3aaaa3a0606281940k63c77ebfga84a854b2cd4ed84@mail.gmail.com> <20060801084156.GD3440@genius.tao.org.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Josef Karthauser (joe) writes: > Dear current folk, I'm forwarding this thread from the -net list where I > asked the question, is it possible to have more than one IP address in a > jail? The answer is yes, with Pawel's patch. The question here is can > I pursuade anyone to commit this to head and MFC it please? The > motivation is simple. I need to run a second SSL web server inside of a > jail, however that needs another IP address because SSL is incompatible > with HTTP/1.1. We have been using these patches all the way back since 5-CURRENT and they work very stable for us. I seem to remember that there were some reservations about the way it was being done, but for that matter it wouldn't be the first hack in jail (like u_int32_t for the ip_number in struct jail :)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060801084053.GE22731>