Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 23:25:35 -0800 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: rank1seeker@gmail.com Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Atheros chip for FreeBSD Access Point Message-ID: <CAJ-VmonPQhcKzog=B60Lapk-MmK_qDOxr8WF2H16w0%2BVZwNwow@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20121216.185304.164.5@DOMY-PC> References: <20121216.143815.770.4@DOMY-PC> <CAJ-Vmon%2BOzgNA0c%2B%2BE7k%2BOJ%2BAhSrXDSR_t18A%2B1rz=nmaCsJsQ@mail.gmail.com> <20121216.185304.164.5@DOMY-PC>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 16 December 2012 10:53, <rank1seeker@gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you Adrian You're welcome! > So you've said: 'AR9280' > It's only bug is: > -- > baseband hangs? > -- > Whatever it means. ;) The baseband occasionally needs poking. don't worry, the workarounds are in the driver. ;) > At which aspects is 'AR9280' inferior to 'AR9287'? Well, the AR9287 is a newer chip and it supports a few new things - most importantly, short-GI in HT20 mode. But honestly, the AR9280 is a nice NIC if you need a PCIe NIC. If you can find a dual-band AR9220 NIC (ie, not an AR9223) then it's a good PCI NIC. Adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-VmonPQhcKzog=B60Lapk-MmK_qDOxr8WF2H16w0%2BVZwNwow>