Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 09:57:36 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 243370] TRYBROKEN equivalent for ONLY_FOR_ARCHS and NOT_FOR_ARCHS Message-ID: <bug-243370-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D243370 Bug ID: 243370 Summary: TRYBROKEN equivalent for ONLY_FOR_ARCHS and NOT_FOR_ARCHS Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Many People Priority: --- Component: Ports Framework Assignee: portmgr@FreeBSD.org Reporter: pkubaj@FreeBSD.org CC: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org I'd like to try building using poudriere bulk -a to see what ports marked as not for powerpc64 will build for this architecture. TRYBROKEN is ok for this, but only when the ports in question are marked BROKEN_powerpc64. However, many ports have NOT_FOR_ARCHS=3Dpowerpc64 or ONLY_FOR_ARCHS=3D${SOME_OTHER_ARCHS}. Many of those ports build and work ju= st fine on other architectures and have those entries because in the past, they didn't. Would it be possible to extend the coverage of TRYBROKEN or add some other variable for ignoring NOT_FOR_ARCHS and ONLY_FOR_ARCHS? This would help with ports testing on powerpc* architectures, but also on a= ll ARM's and MIPS. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-243370-7788>