Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2019 10:35:34 -0600 From: Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org> To: Ed Maste <emaste@FreeBSD.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r350505 - in head: contrib/binutils/binutils/doc gnu/usr.bin/binutils/objdump Message-ID: <23d23900d06581050562951f5cf6a625235a059f.camel@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201908011442.x71Egfa9047254@repo.freebsd.org> References: <201908011442.x71Egfa9047254@repo.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 2019-08-01 at 14:42 +0000, Ed Maste wrote: > Author: emaste > Date: Thu Aug 1 14:42:41 2019 > New Revision: 350505 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/350505 > > Log: > objdump: be explicit that GNU objdump that will be removed > > We may install llvm-objdump as objdump (see review D18307) or just > provide no /usr/bin/objdump, but either way GNU objdump won't be > installed in the future. > Why would we provide no objdump? I use it quite frequently; it seems like an essential part of the toolchain to me. -- Ian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?23d23900d06581050562951f5cf6a625235a059f.camel>