Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2000 20:55:27 -0500 From: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu> To: Bill Fumerola <billf@mu.org> Cc: Alexander Langer <alex@big.endian.de>, Andreas Klemm <andreas@klemm.gtn.com>, Andreas Klemm <andreas@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/print/apsfilter Makefile distinfo pkg-comment pkg-descr pkg-plist ports/print/apsfilter/scripts configure Message-ID: <20001223205526.B15046@argon.firepipe.net> In-Reply-To: <20001223143010.C72273@elvis.mu.org>; from billf@mu.org on Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 02:30:10PM -0600 References: <200012231328.eBNDS4Y67614@freefall.freebsd.org> <20001223122211.Y72273@elvis.mu.org> <20001223194942.A92298@titan.klemm.gtn.com> <20001223203235.A1011@cichlids.cichlids.com> <20001223135503.A72273@elvis.mu.org> <20001223210626.E1011@cichlids.cichlids.com> <20001223143010.C72273@elvis.mu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 02:30:10PM -0600, Bill Fumerola wrote: > It would be nice to have both pieces of history (and as long as no > one cleans out apsfilter6, we will always have both), but there is > no way to superimpose apsfilter6's history on top of apsfilter. > > The end result (having one port named apsfilter be the one and only > apsfilter port) is more important then somehow having both pieces > of history in one RCS file. Andreas certainly could have just used a branch tag on the original apsfilter port to track apsfilter 6.x. I don't usually see much point in having ports for both devel and stable versions of the same program. -- wca To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001223205526.B15046>