Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 7 May 2008 17:56:53 -0700
From:      Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org>
To:        Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>, cvs-src@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/include stdio.h src/lib/libc/stdio clrerr.c feof.c ferror.c fileno.c getc.c getchar.c local.h putc.c putchar.c xprintf.c
Message-ID:  <20080508005653.GH32532@elvis.mu.org>
In-Reply-To: <48223918.4010001@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <200805051603.m45G3rrN089219@repoman.freebsd.org> <200805051637.43073.jhb@freebsd.org> <20080507064013.GU32532@elvis.mu.org> <200805071111.39938.jhb@freebsd.org> <20080507231444.GF32532@elvis.mu.org> <48223918.4010001@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> [080507 16:20] wrote:
> Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> >
> >(*) Important note: when considering autoconf scripts, most of the
> >scripts test's come from a repository of scripts or are carbon
> >copied from each other.  Saying that "all ports are broken" is not
> >true, it is a single suite of configuration scripts that are broken
> >and need fixing, then we will be OK.
> >
> >We have precident here of hacked autoconf and ports build logic
> >that automatically "seds" various things in scripts.  I think
> >a few knobs can fix this for us.
> 
> The offer was a serious one.  If you're interested in evaluating the 
> impact of this change on ports then just say the word.

There's no way I can look at this within the next two months.

Afterwards I will give it a shot if time permits.

-- 
- Alfred Perlstein



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080508005653.GH32532>