Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 22:12:16 +0100 From: Divacky Roman <xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, "Thomas M. Hermann" <tmh.public@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Linuxolator on AMD64 Guidance Message-ID: <20070320211216.GA46105@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> In-Reply-To: <20070320220616.65b853a2@Magellan.Leidinger.net> References: <46003EA9.6060305@gmail.com> <20070320220616.65b853a2@Magellan.Leidinger.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 10:06:16PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Quoting "Thomas M. Hermann" <tmh.public@gmail.com> (Tue, 20 Mar 2007 15:06:01 -0500): > > > Greetings, > > > > Is the goal of current linuxolator development to update support to > > 2.6.16 to be 64bit on amd64 or just update to 2.6.16 and run 32bit apps > > on amd64 as is done now? I've subscribed to freebsd-emulation & > > The goal is to get 2.6.16 running. There's no active development for > 64bit support on amd64 (at least I'm not aware of one). netbsd supports linux@amd64 emulation and I think I could do the port in a few weeks. if I get decent access to amd64 machine and enough time/money :) but seriously... linux64 emulation is a MUST and I think the port of netbsd code should not be THAT hard.... opinions?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070320211216.GA46105>