Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 14:11:06 +0000 From: Bruce Cran <bruce@cran.org.uk> To: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Bruce Cran <brucec@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r215034 - in head: libexec/tftpd sys/arm/xscale/ixp425 sys/boot/arm/ixp425/boot2 sys/dev/ata sys/dev/drm sys/dev/isp sys/dev/ixgbe sys/dev/msk sys/dev/pccard sys/dev/sound/sbus sys/dev/... Message-ID: <201011091411.06842.bruce@cran.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20101109140007.GJ2054@hoeg.nl> References: <201011091059.oA9Ax9id007463@svn.freebsd.org> <20101109140007.GJ2054@hoeg.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday 09 November 2010 14:00:07 Ed Schouten wrote: > * Bruce Cran <brucec@FreeBSD.org>, 20101109 11:59: > > - /* fail requests on the queue and any thats "in flight" for this > > device */ + /* fail requests on the queue and any that's "in flight" > > for this device */ > > Shouldn't it be "that are"? Possibly. If there can only ever be one request "in flight" at a time it could also be read as "fail requests on the queue and any request that is "in flight" for this device". I'm not sure which is correct. -- Bruce Cran
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201011091411.06842.bruce>