Date: 06 May 2000 13:02:12 -0700 From: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) To: Shigeyuki Fukushima <shige@FreeBSD.org> Cc: kris@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/Mk bsd.emacs.mk bsd.port.mk Message-ID: <vqcpuqzwipn.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: Shigeyuki Fukushima's message of "Sun, 07 May 2000 00:13:37 %2B0900" References: <200005061045.DAA61204@freefall.freebsd.org> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0005060532430.69390-100000@freefall.freebsd.org> <20000506151430344.NOEJ.904.t-mta2.odn.ne.jp@mta2.odn.ne.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* From: Shigeyuki Fukushima <shige@FreeBSD.org>
* After argument at ports-jp ML, "ports" (or "port") string is redundant.
* Because this file is in ${PORTSDIR}/Mk.
Yes. I think of bsd.port.* as main infrastructure files that are
included from Makefiles. Those that just implement a small part of
what bsd.port.mk does now can be split into subfiles and they can be
distinguished by not having the "port" in there.
* In this sense, I think that ${PORTSDIR}/Mk/bsd.port.mk should be
* renamed to a proper filename. :)
What, to ${PORTSDIR}/Mk/bsd.mk? That's a little extreme.... ;)
Satoshi
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?vqcpuqzwipn.fsf>