Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 24 Nov 2007 04:30:29 +0100
From:      "Attilio Rao" <attilio@freebsd.org>
To:        "Robert Watson" <rwatson@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Stephan Uphoff <ups@freebsd.org>, Max Laier <max@love2party.net>, Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: rwlocks, correctness over speed.
Message-ID:  <3bbf2fe10711231930m459dc800wbbb894b9fd50ca13@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20071123235346.E14018@fledge.watson.org>
References:  <20071121222319.GX44563@elvis.mu.org> <200711221641.02484.max@love2party.net> <3bbf2fe10711220753u435ff4cbxa94d5b682292b970@mail.gmail.com> <200711221726.27108.max@love2party.net> <20071123082339.GN44563@elvis.mu.org> <47469328.8020404@freebsd.org> <20071123092415.GP44563@elvis.mu.org> <4746F858.4070301@freebsd.org> <20071123235346.E14018@fledge.watson.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2007/11/24, Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>:
> While I'm no great fan of recursion, the reality is that many of our kernel
> subsystems are not yet ready to disallow recursion on locks.  Take a look at
> the cases where we explicitly enable recursive acquisition for mutexes--in
> practice, most network stack mutexes are recursive due to the recursive
> calling in the network stack.  While someday I'd like to think we'll be able
> to eliminate some of that, but it won't be soon since it requires significant
> reworking of very complicated code.  The current model in which recursion is
> explicitly enabled only where still required seems to work pretty well for the
> existing code, although it's hard to say yet in the code I've looked at
> whether read recursion would be required--the situations I have in mind would
> require purely write recursion.  There's one case in the UNIX domain socket
> code where we do a locked test and conditional lock/unlock with an rwlock for
> exclusive locking because recursion isn't currently supported, and that's not
> a usage I'd like to encourage more of.

Oh, I just didn't notice this -- rwlock are only present in 7.0 and in
7.0 they support recursion in exclusive mode, so I'm not sure what do
you mean with 'recursion isn't currently supported'.

Thanks,
Attilio


-- 
Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. Einstein



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3bbf2fe10711231930m459dc800wbbb894b9fd50ca13>