Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 14:01:45 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com> Cc: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>, Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.ORG>, Tim Vanderhoek <vanderh@ecf.utoronto.ca>, James Howard <howardjp@wam.umd.edu>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: mktemp() vs. mkstemp() Message-ID: <200005162001.OAA80550@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 16 May 2000 11:46:25 MDT." <39218971.AE6779B5@softweyr.com> References: <39218971.AE6779B5@softweyr.com> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0005141952440.20005-100000@freefall.freebsd.org> <39204472.706CB1D2@softweyr.com> <20000515123256.C249@fw.wintelcom.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <39218971.AE6779B5@softweyr.com> Wes Peters writes: : Drat, that's right. Anyone wanna pollute the kernel and filesystem : layers with a "reserve this filename" function? That sounds fugly, : doesn't it? Yes. It isn't needed. mkstemp already does the looping to make it safe. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200005162001.OAA80550>