Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 26 Dec 2007 09:57:45 +0300
From:      "Andrey V. Elsukov" <>
Subject:   Re: kern/118993: [ipfw] page fault - probably it's a locking problem
Message-ID:  <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References:  <>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help wrote:
> State-Changed-When: Tue Dec 25 14:14:45 UTC 2007
> State-Changed-Why: 
> Oops, it was actually a recursive panic and the first one is indeed
> ipfw-related.  The ipfw ruleset would still help though.

I'm not sure that Maxim (a person who got the problem) can
publish his rules. But as i know there is a typical firewall-script
(`ipfw -f flush` and a lot of other rules).

As i see in the code, panic is in the line 2538:

  if (set_disable & (1 << f->set) )

I think panic here can be only when "f" is invalid. I'm right?
But it seems protected with IPFW_RLOCK...

WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <>