Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 8 Apr 1999 18:29:17 +0930
From:      Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>
To:        remy@synx.com
Cc:        hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Volume managers (was: Separate boot partition?)
Message-ID:  <19990408182917.G2142@lemis.com>
In-Reply-To: <199904080844.KAA07975@rt2.synx.com>; from Remy Nonnenmacher on Thu, Apr 08, 1999 at 10:44:15AM %2B0200
References:  <19990408173016.X2142@lemis.com> <199904080844.KAA07975@rt2.synx.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday,  8 April 1999 at 10:44:15 +0200, Remy Nonnenmacher wrote:
> On  8 Apr, Greg Lehey wrote:
>> On Thursday,  8 April 1999 at  8:52:24 +0100, Dom Mitchell wrote:
>>> On 8 April 1999, Greg Lehey proclaimed:
>>>> I can't see why not, since it's possible now.  What we still need to
>>>> do is find a way to extend a file system, but that's a ufs issue
>>>> (which has a solution), not a volume manager issue.
>>>
>>> What about shrinking an fs?  Is that feasible?  Possible?
>>
>> According to Kirk McKusick, no.
>>
> too bad !!
>
> Really, merging the best of all worlds (AIX PV migration, fs 'live'
> extendability) *AND* fs shrinking would be a really impressive
> performance.
>
> Think about it : A set of SCA, hot-pluggable disks. Every fs movable,
> resizable (up/down), every disk content movable from/to every other
> one.... the perfect power-on once, run till-end-of-universe server.

Well, with the exception of the file system shrinking, we have all
that.  I honestly don't think we'll find a need to shrink file systems
too often.

Greg
--
See complete headers for address, home page and phone numbers
finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990408182917.G2142>