Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2017 19:49:19 -0500 From: "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@over-yonder.net> To: Marco Beishuizen <mbeis@xs4all.nl> Cc: Thomas Mueller <mueller6722@twc.com>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Status of portupgrade and portmaster? Message-ID: <20171002004919.GL53186@over-yonder.net> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.21.1709292118310.3034@yokozuna> References: <81D84A650858BA40BF6936408052E6BC0138263988@msgdb11.utad.utoledo.edu> <k20i-pniy-wny@FreeBSD.org> <201709290909.v8T99QtU006095@mxdrop301.xs4all.net> <alpine.BSF.2.21.1709292118310.3034@yokozuna>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 09:21:31PM +0200 I heard the voice of Marco Beishuizen, and lo! it spake thus: > > Using portupgrade every day and still works great. Tried portmaster > once but liked portupgrade more. I use poudriere just for testing > ports. I also use portupgrade constantly on several systems, and portmaster occasionally for some special cases where it has advantages. I also use poudriere on a lot of systems. Actually, most, nowadays. And I'm extremely happy with it. But I expect the systems I'm running straight out of ports now will continue to do so for a very long time, since poudriere just won't fit at all. -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20171002004919.GL53186>