Date: 08 Oct 1998 18:24:45 +0200 From: dag-erli@ifi.uio.no (Dag-Erling C. =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= ) To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: Matthew Thyer <thyerm@eddie.dsto.defence.gov.au>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is tickadj still required in -CURRENT ? Message-ID: <xzpk92byqb6.fsf@hindarfjell.ifi.uio.no> In-Reply-To: Poul-Henning Kamp's message of "Thu, 08 Oct 1998 18:12:18 %2B0200" References: <5743.907863138@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> writes: > In message <xzpsogzys0f.fsf@hindarfjell.ifi.uio.no>, Dag-Erling C. =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= writes: > >Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> writes: > > > In message <199810081342.XAA01038@eddie.dsto.defence.gov.au>, Matthew Thyer writes: > > > > So, has FreeBSD-CURRENT's kernel been fixed and can tickadj be removed > > > > from the base system ? > > > Yes and no. > > Care to elaborate, or are we just too stupid to comprehend the depth > > of Your Maginificence's explanation? > Yes, it has been fixed. > No, it hasn't been removed. The original question was "can tickadj be removed". You answered no. I think it might be relevant to explain *why* it can't be removed. If it *can* be removed, but hasn't, shouldn't it be done? DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - dag-erli@ifi.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpk92byqb6.fsf>