Date: Sun, 2 Mar 1997 18:44:13 -0400 (AST) From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> To: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com> Cc: Charles Henrich <henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu>, ejs@bfd.com, jmb@freefall.freebsd.org, jkh@time.cdrom.com, taob@risc.org, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 2.2 Compiler slower than 2.1? (was RSA 56-bit key challenge) Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970302184218.9863J-100000@thelab.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <199703022233.OAA07265@rah.star-gate.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 2 Mar 1997, Amancio Hasty wrote: > Nope, I can keep trying different combinations including static 8) > With pgcc-current, if I get rid of the m486 and add -finline-functions (and/or ASM_I486), I get values on par with what comes in the binary. Oh, and I added -lm to LIBS... > Cheers, > Amancio > > >From The Desk Of Charles Henrich : > > > Still comes in about 2500keys/sec slower on a P133 *shrug* > > > > > > > > > > ./rc5-56-client -m > > > rc5-56-client: Performance testing with 1000000 crypts > > > rc5-56-client: Complete in 8.565 seconds. (116754.49 keys/sec) > > > > > > > ./rc5-56-client -m > > > rc5-56-client: Performance testing with 1000000 crypts > > > rc5-56-client: Complete in 8.540 seconds. (117097.90 keys/sec) > > > > > > > ./rc5-client-freebsd -m > > > rc5-56-client: Performance testing with 1000000 crypts > > > rc5-56-client: Complete in 8.038 seconds. (124401.52 keys/sec) > > > > You also need the new math libs I imagine. Amancio did you compile that > > static? > > > > -Crh > > > > Charles Henrich Michigan State University henrich@msu.edu > > > > http://pilot.msu.edu/~henrich >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.970302184218.9863J-100000>