Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 13:53:26 -0600 From: Jim Thompson <jim@netgate.com> To: =?utf-8?Q?Antoine_Beaupr=C3=A9?= <anarcat@koumbit.org> Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Ermal_Lu=C3=A7i?= <eri@freebsd.org>, freebsd-net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> Subject: Re: OpenBGPd + TCP-MD5 sig fails after a few weeks Message-ID: <F0C0354C-342B-4072-9D57-1D850F9213B1@netgate.com> In-Reply-To: <87ob55ucbf.fsf@marcos.anarc.at> References: <87zjoqu3wr.fsf@marcos.anarc.at> <CAPBZQG192HxfHfCj7zkWO-Ot95%2BY7vr8VJ47OyzNhD2jxuZTKg@mail.gmail.com> <87ob55ucbf.fsf@marcos.anarc.at>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Nov 27, 2013, at 8:52, Antoine Beaupr=C3=A9 <anarcat@koumbit.org> wrote= : >=20 > Any reason why the port wasn't updated in FreeBSD? No, though historically the community has been stoic about taking patches ba= ck from pfSense.=20=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?F0C0354C-342B-4072-9D57-1D850F9213B1>