Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 09:33:04 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@starjuice.net> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>, drosih@rpi.edu, FreeBSD-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Do we still need portmap(8)? Message-ID: <20021010073304.GE99645@starjuice.net> In-Reply-To: <3DA50A3B.6E0521E6@mindspring.com> References: <200210072127.58523.dzerkel@columbus.rr.com> <3DA498EA.C7BF77A@mindspring.com> <p05111701b9ca84c308c3@[128.113.24.47]> <20021009.220112.82861653.imp@bsdimp.com> <3DA50A3B.6E0521E6@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On (2002/10/09 22:03), Terry Lambert wrote: > The other problem with an mtree.obsolete is that it assumes > the the upgrade process completes successfully. This doesn't > mean that it completes without an error in the upgrade process, > it means that the resulting system functions. Why not just let Warner (or whoever) make this "solution" available and see how it flies? People like you and me who have our own simple and effective ways of pruning stale files can just ignore it or hack it out. Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021010073304.GE99645>